The Effect of a Collaborative Pediatric Emergency Readiness Improvement Intervention on Patients' Hospital Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that collaborative intervention to improve weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) will be associated with decreased pediatric intensive care (PICU) mortality, PICU and hospital length of stay. METHODS: This study analyzes the transfer of acutely ill and injured patients from general emergency departments (GEDs) to our institution. The intervention involved customized assessment reports focusing on team performance and systems improvement for pediatric readiness, sharing best practices and clinical resources, designation of a nurse PECC at each GED and ongoing interactions at 2 and 4 months. Data was collected from charts before and after the intervention, focusing on patients transferred to our pediatric emergency department (ED) or directly admitted to our PICU from the GEDs. Clinical outcomes such as PICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and PICU mortality were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics, and various statistical tests were employed to analyze the data. Bivariate analyses and multivariable models were utilized to examine patient outcomes and the association between the intervention and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 278 patients in the pre-intervention period and 314 patients in the post-intervention period. Multivariable analyses revealed a significant association between the change in WPRS and decreased PICU LOS (ß=-0.05 [95% CI: -0.09, -0.01), p=0.023), and hospital LOS (ß=-0.12 [95% CI: -0.21, -0.04], p=0.004), but showed no association between the intervention and other patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, improving pediatric readiness scores in GEDs was associated with significant improvements in PICU and hospital length of stay. Future initiatives should focus on disseminating pediatric readiness efforts to improve outcomes of critically ill children nationally. WHATS NEW: Improving pediatric readiness scores in general emergency departments is associated with improved downstream clinical outcomes demonstrated by reduced PICU and hospital length of stay.

Revisiting Post-ICU Admission Fluid Balance Across Pediatric Sepsis Mortality Risk Strata: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Post-ICU admission cumulative positive fluid balance (PFB) is associated with increased mortality among critically ill patients. We sought to test whether this risk varied across biomarker-based risk strata upon adjusting for illness severity, presence of severe acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury), and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in pediatric septic shock. DESIGN: Ongoing multicenter prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Thirteen PICUs in the United States (2003-2023). PATIENTS: Six hundred and eighty-one children with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cumulative percent PFB between days 1 and 7 (days 1-7 %PFB) was determined. Primary outcome of interest was complicated course defined as death or persistence of greater than or equal to two organ dysfunctions by day 7. Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model (PERSEVERE)-II biomarkers were used to assign mortality probability and categorize patients into high mortality (n = 91), intermediate mortality (n = 134), and low mortality (n = 456) risk strata. Cox proportional hazard regression models with adjustment for PERSEVERE-II mortality probability, presence of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury on day 3, and use of CRRT, demonstrated that time-dependent variable days 1-7%PFB was independently associated with an increased hazard of complicated course. Risk-stratified analyses revealed that each 10% increase in days 1-7 %PFB was associated with increased hazard of complicated course only among patients with high mortality risk strata (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24 (95% CI, 1.08-1.43), p = 0.003). However, this association was not causally mediated by PERSEVERE-II biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the influence of cumulative %PFB on the risk of complicated course in pediatric septic shock. Contrary to our previous report, this risk was largely driven by patients categorized as having a high mortality risk based on PERSEVERE-II biomarkers. Incorporation of such prognostic enrichment tools in randomized trials of restrictive fluid management or early initiation of de-escalation strategies may inform targeted application of such interventions among at-risk patients.

Deep Sedation in Pediatric Patients With Single Ventricle Physiology Outside of the Operating Room.

Background: Advancements in palliative surgery of patients with single ventricle physiology have led to an increase in the need for deep sedation protocols for painful procedures. However, positive pressure ventilation during anesthesia can result in unfavorable cardiopulmonary interactions. This patient population may benefit from sedation from these painful procedures. Methods: This study aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of deep sedation by pediatric intensivists outside the operating room for children with single ventricle physiology. This is a single-center, retrospective chart review on consecutive pediatric patients with single ventricle physiology who received deep sedation performed by pediatric intensivists between 2013 and 2020. Results: Thirty-three sedations were performed on 27 unique patients. The median age was 3.7 years (25th%-75th%: 2.1-15.6). The majority of the sedations, 88% (29/33), were done on children with Fontan physiology and 12% (4/33) were status-post superior cavopulmonary anastomosis. The primary cardiac defect was hypoplastic left heart in 63% (17/27) of all sedation procedures. There were 24 chest tube placements and 9 cardioversions. Ketamine alone [median dose 1.5 mg/kg (range 0.8-3.7)], ketamine [median dose 1 mg/kg (range 0.1-2.1)] with propofol [median dose 2.3 mg/kg (range 0.7-3.8)], and ketamine [median dose 1.5 mg/kg (range 0.4-3.0)] with morphine [median dose 0.06 mg/kg (range 0.03-0.20)] were the most common sedation regimens used. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 patients (15%), three of which were transient AEs. All sedation encounters were successfully completed. Conclusion: Procedural deep sedation can be safely and effectively administered to single ventricle patients by intensivist-led sedation teams in selective case.

Revisiting post-ICU admission fluid balance across pediatric sepsis mortality risk strata: A secondary analyses from a prospective observational cohort study.

Introduction: Post-ICU admission cumulative positive fluid balance (PFB) is associated with increased mortality among critically ill patients. We sought to test whether this risk varied across biomarker-based risk strata upon adjusting for illness severity, presence of severe acute kidney injury (AKI), and use of renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in pediatric septic shock. Design: Ongoing multi-center prospective observational cohort. Setting: Thirteen pediatric ICUs in the United States (2003-2023). Patients: Six hundred and eighty-one children with septic shock. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Cumulative percent positive fluid balance between day 1-7 (Day 1-7%PFB) was determined. Primary outcome of interest was complicated course defined as death or persistence of ≥ 2 organ dysfunctions by day 7. PERSEVERE-II biomarkers were used to assign mortality probability and categorize patients into high (n = 91), intermediate (n = 134), and low (n = 456) mortality risk strata. Cox proportional hazard regression models with adjustment for PERSEVERE-II mortality probability, presence of sepsis associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) on Day 3, and any use of CRRT, demonstrated that time-dependent variable Day 1-7%PFB was independently associated with increased hazard of complicated course in the cohort. Risk stratified analyses revealed that each 10% increase in Day 1-7%PFB was independently associated with increased hazard of complicated course among patients with high mortality risk strata (adj HR of 1.24 (95%CI: 1.08-1.42), p = 0.002), but not among those categorized as intermediate- or low- mortality risk. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the independent influence of cumulative %PFB on the risk of complicated course. Contrary to our previous report, this risk was largely driven by patients categorized as having a high-mortality risk based on PERSEVERE-II biomarkers. Further research is necessary to determine whether this subset of patients may benefit from targeted deployment of restrictive fluid management or early initiation of de-escalation therapies upon resolution of shock.

Determining the Association Between Emergency Department Crowding and Debriefing After Pediatric Trauma Resuscitations.

BACKGROUND: Debriefing in the pediatric emergency department (PED) is an invaluable tool to improve team well-being, communication, and performance. Despite evidence, surveys have reported heavy workload as a barrier to debriefing leading to missed opportunities for improvement in an already busy ED. The study aims to determine the association between the incidence of debriefing after pediatric trauma resuscitations and PED crowding. METHODS: A total of 491 Trauma One activations in Riley Children's Hospital Pediatric Emergency Department that presented between April 2018 to December 2019 were included in the study. Debriefing documentations, patient demographics, time and date of presentation, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, disposition from PED, and length of stay (LOS) were collected and analyzed. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale score at arrival, Average LOS, total PED census, total PED waiting room census, and rates of left without being seen were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 491 Trauma One activations presented to our PED, 50 (10%) trauma evaluations had documented debriefing. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale score at presentation was significantly lower in those with debriefing versus without debriefing. In addition, the PED hourly census, waiting room census, average LOS, and left without being seen were also significantly lower in the group with debriefing. In addition, trauma cases with debriefing had a higher proportion of patients with profound injuries and discharges to the morgue. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric emergency department crowding is a significant barrier to debriefing after trauma resuscitations. However, profound injuries and traumatic pediatric deaths remain the strongest predictors in conducting debriefing regardless of PED crowding status.

Mechanisms to expedite pediatric clinical trial site activation: The DOSE trial experience.

BACKGROUND: Timely trial start-up is a key determinant of trial success; however, delays during start-up are common and costly. Moreover, data on start-up metrics in pediatric clinical trials are sparse. To expedite trial start-up, the Trial Innovation Network piloted three novel mechanisms in the trial titled Dexmedetomidine Opioid Sparing Effect in Mechanically Ventilated Children (DOSE), a multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in the pediatric intensive care setting. METHODS: The three novel start-up mechanisms included: 1) competitive activation; 2) use of trial start-up experts, called site navigators; and 3) supplemental funds earned for achieving pre-determined milestones. After sites were activated, they received a web-based survey to report perceptions of the DOSE start-up process. In addition to perceptions, metrics analyzed included milestones met, time to start-up, and subsequent enrollment of subjects. RESULTS: Twenty sites were selected for participation, with 19 sites being fully activated. Across activated sites, the median (quartile 1, quartile 3) time from receipt of regulatory documents to site activation was 82 days (68, 113). Sites reported that of the three novel mechanisms, the most motivating factor for expeditious activation was additional funding available for achieving start-up milestones, followed by site navigator assistance and then competitive site activation. CONCLUSION: Study start-up is a critical time for the success of clinical trials, and innovative methods to minimize delays during start-up are needed. Milestone-based funds and site navigators were preferred mechanisms by sites participating in the DOSE study and may have contributed to the expeditious start-up timeline achieved. CLINICALTRIALS: gov #: NCT03938857.

Safety and Efficacy of Propofol- and Ketamine-Based Procedural Sedation Regimen in Pediatric Patients During Burn Repetitive Dressing Change: 10 Years Single Center Experience.

It is crucial to provide an adequate level of sedation and analgesia during burn dressing changes in the pediatric population due to the amount of pain and anxiety patients experience during the procedure. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intensivist-based deep sedation regimen using a combination of propofol and ketamine to provide procedural sedation to pediatric burn patients. This is a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent inpatient burn wound dressing changes from 2011 through 2021. Demographic and clinical data, including age, length of the procedure, recovery time, medication doses, and adverse events, were collected. A total of 104 patients aged between 45 and 135 months with a median total burn body surface area (TBSA) of 11.5 percent (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0, 25.0) underwent 378 procedural sedation encounters with propofol- and ketamine-based sedation. The median total dose of propofol was 7 mg/kg (IRQ 5.3, 9.2). Of these sedations, 64 (17 percent) had minor adverse events, of which 50 (13 percent) were transient hypoxemia, 12 (3 percent) were upper airway obstruction, and 2 (0.5 percent) were hypotension. There were no serious adverse events. Hypoxemia was not related to age, weight, gender, burn TBSA, or total dose of propofol. There were 35 (33.6 percent) patients who had repetitive sedation encounters with no statistically significant changes in propofol dose or adverse events with the repeated encounters. Children can be effectively sedated for repetitive inpatient burn dressing changes. Given the high-risk patient populations, this procedure should be performed under the vigilance of highly trained providers.

Simulation-based assessment of care for an infant with cardiogenic shock in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of infant deaths associated with birth defects. Neonates with undiagnosed CHD often present to general emergency departments (GEDs) for initial resuscitation that are less prepared than paediatric centres, resulting in disparities in the quality of care. Neonates with undiagnosed CHD represent a challenge; thus, it is necessary for GEDs to be prepared for this population. AIM: To evaluate the process of resuscitative care provided to a neonate in cardiogenic shock due to CHD in the GEDs in a simulated setting and to describe the impact of teams and GED variables on the process of care. METHODS: This is a prospective simulation-based assessment of the process of care provided to a neonate with coarctation of the aorta in cardiogenic shock. Simulation sessions were conducted at participating GEDs utilizing each GED's interdisciplinary team and resources. The primary outcome was adherence to best practice, as measured by a 15-item overall composite adherence score (CAS). In addition, we stratified the overall CAS into CHD-critical items and the general resuscitation items CAS. The secondary outcome was the impact of the team's and GED's characteristics on the scores. RESULTS: This study enrolled 32 teams from 12 GEDs. Among 161 participants, 103 (63.97%) were registered nurses, 33 (20.50%) were physicians, 17 (10.56%) were respiratory therapists, and 8 (4.97%) were other medical professionals. The overall median CAS was 84, with the CHD-critical items having a median CAS of 34.5. The most underperformed tasks are checking pulses on the upper and lower extremities (44%), obtaining blood pressure in the upper and lower extremities (25%), and administering prostaglandin E1 (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Using in situ simulation in a set of GEDs, we revealed gaps in the resuscitation care of neonates with CHD in cardiogenic shock. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These findings highlight the importance of targeted improvement programs for high-stakes illnesses in GED.

Improving Emergency Preparedness in Pediatric Primary Care Offices: A Simulation-Based Interventional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric emergencies pose a challenge to primary care practices due to irregular frequency and complexity. Simulation-based assessment can improve skills and comfort in emergencies. Our aim was improving pediatric office emergency preparedness, as measured by adherence to the existing American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement, and quality of emergency care in a simulated setting, as measured by performance checklists. METHODS: This was a single center study nested in a multicenter, prospective study measuring emergency preparedness and quality of care in 16 pediatric primary care practices and consisted of 3 phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. Baseline emergency preparedness was measured by checklist based on AAP guidelines, and quality of care was assessed using in-situ simulation. A report-out was provided along with resources addressing potential areas for improvement after baseline assessment. A repeat preparedness and simulation assessment was performed after a 6 to 10 month intervention period to measure improvement from baseline. RESULTS: Sixteen offices were recruited with 13 completing baseline and follow-up preparedness assessment. Eight of these sites also completed baseline and follow-up simulation assessment. Median baseline preparedness score was 70% and follow-up was 75.9%. Median baseline simulation performance scores were 37.4% and 35.5% for respiratory distress and seizure scenarios, respectively. Follow-up simulation assessment scores were 73% and 76.9% respectively (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our collaborative was able to successfully improve the quality of care in a simulated setting in a group of pediatric primary care offices over 6 to 10 months. Future work will focus on expansion and improving emergency preparedness.

Quality of Resuscitative Care Provided to an Infant With Abusive Head Trauma in Community Emergency Departments: An In Situ, Prospective, Simulation-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES: Abusive head trauma (AHT) is a very common and serious form of physical abuse, and a major cause of mortality and morbidity for young children. Early Recognition and supportive care of children with AHT is a common challenge in community emergency department (CEDs). We hypothesized that standardized, in situ simulation can be used to measure and compare the quality of resuscitative measures provided to children with AHT in a diverse set of CEDs. METHODS: This prospective, simulation-based study measured teams' performance across CEDs. The primary outcome was overall adherence to AHT using a 15-item performance assessment checklist based on the number of tasks performed correctly on the checklist. RESULTS: Fifty-three multiprofessional teams from 18 CEDs participated in the study. Of 270 participants, 20.7% were physicians, 65.2% registered nurses, and 14.1% were other providers. Out of all tasks, assessment of airway/breathing was the most successfully conducted task by 53/53 teams (100%). Although 43/53 teams (81%) verbalized the suspicion for AHT, only 21 (39.6%) of 53 teams used hyperosmolar agent, 4 (7.5%) of 53 teams applied cervical spine collar stabilization, and 6 (11.3%) of 53 teams raised the head of the bed. No significant difference in adherence to the checklist was found in the CEDs with an inpatient pediatric service or these with designated adult trauma centers compared with CEDs without. Community emergency departments closer to the main academic center outperformed CEDs these that are further away. CONCLUSIONS: This study used in situ simulation to describe quality of resuscitative care provided to an infant presenting with AHT across a diverse set of CEDs, revealing variability in the initial recognition and stabilizing efforts and provided and targets for improvement. Future interventions focusing on reducing these gaps could improve the performance of CED providers and lead to improved patient outcomes.

Improving Pediatric Readiness and Clinical Care in General Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative initiative between general emergency departments (EDs) and the pediatric academic medical center on the process of clinical care in a group of general EDs. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study assessed the process of clinical care delivered to critically ill children presenting to 3 general EDs. Our previous multifaceted intervention included the following components: postsimulation debriefing, designation of a pediatric champion, customized performance reports, pediatric resources toolkit, and ongoing interactions. Five pediatric emergency care physicians conducted chart reviews and scored encounters using the Pediatric Emergency Care Research Network's Quality of Care Implicit Review Instrument, which assigns scores between 5 and 35 across 5 domains. In addition, safety metrics were collected for medication, imaging, and laboratory orders. RESULTS: A total of 179 ED encounters were reviewed, including 103 preintervention and 76 postintervention encounters, with an improvement in mean total quality score from 23.30 (SD 5.1) to 24.80 (4.0). In the domain of physician initial treatment plan and initial orders, scores increased from a mean of 4.18 (0.13) to 4.61 (0.15). In the category of safety, administration of wrong medications decreased from 28.2% to 11.8% after the intervention. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted collaborative initiative involving simulation and enhanced pediatric readiness was associated with improvement in the processes of care in general EDs. This work provides evidence that innovative collaborations between academic medical centers and general EDs may serve as an effective strategy to improve pediatric care.

Improving the Quality of Clinical Care of Children with Diabetic Ketoacidosis in General Emergency Departments Following a Collaborative Improvement Program with an Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative initiative between a group of general emergency departments (EDs) and an academic medical center (AMC) on the process of care provided to patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) across these EDs. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (January 2015 to December 2018) of all pediatric patients <18 years who presented with DKA to participating EDs and were subsequently admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the AMC. Our multifaceted intervention included simulation with postsimulation debriefing, targeted assessment reports, distribution of DKA best practices, pediatric DKA module, and scheduled check-in visits. The process of clinical care was measured by adherence to the pediatric DKA 9-item checklist. Adherence was scored based on the number of items performed correctly and calculated using equal weight for items and dividing by the total number of items. Patients' clinical outcomes also were collected. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with DKA were included in the analysis; 38 patients were in the preintervention, and 47 were in the postintervention. There was a statistically significant improvement in adherence to the DKA checklist from 77.8% to 88.9%. Two of the 9 checklist items (hourly glucose check and appropriate fluid rate) showed statistically significant improvement. No significant change in patient clinical outcomes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our collaborative initiative resulted in significant improvements in adherence to pediatric DKA best practices across a group of general EDs. A collaborative approach between general EDs and AMCs is an effective improvement strategy for pediatric emergency care.

Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Traditional Simulation for Training Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Specialists in Circuit Air Emergency Management: A Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a highly complex therapy used to support critically ill patients. Simulation-based training of ECMO specialists in the management of ECMO emergencies has been described in the literature, but optimal methods are not currently established. The objective of this study was to compare rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) simulation versus traditional simulation (TS) with reflective debriefing for training ECMO specialists in the management of arterial air emergencies. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, pre-post interventional design was used to compare the impact of RCDP training with that of TS training on ECMO specialist performance during a simulated ECMO circuit emergency. Participants were divided into 2 training groups-RCDP and TS. Each participant completed a simulated arterial air emergency scenario before training, immediately after training, and again 3 months later. The primary outcome was the time required by individual participants to complete critical clinical actions. RESULTS: Twenty-four ECMO specialists completed the study. Immediately after the training, the RCDP group had faster times to dissociate the patient from the ECMO circuit (11-seconds RCDP vs. 16-seconds TS, P = 0.03) and times to re-establish ECMO support (59-seconds RCDP vs. 82.5-seconds TS, P = 0.01). Follow-up testing at 3 months showed persistence in faster times to re-establish ECMO support in the RCDP group (114-seconds RCDP vs. 199-seconds TS, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation provides a superior curriculum and method of training ECMO specialists in the management of arterial air emergencies in comparison with traditional simulation.

Improvement of Pediatric Advanced Airway Management in General Emergency Departments After a Collaborative Intervention Program.

BACKGROUND: In general emergency departments, advanced airway management of pediatric patients who are critically ill has been associated with increased adverse events given the varying exposure to pediatric patients and limited resources. Previous studies have shown significant improvement of simulated pediatric airway management in general emergency departments. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the effect of an in situ simulation-based collaborative intervention program on the actual care of pediatric airway management in general emergency departments. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of pediatric subjects who were critically ill and required intubation at a diverse set of general emergency departments before referral to the academic medical center. The primary outcome was the quality of clinical care measured by adherence to best practices via a critical action checklist. Secondary outcomes included tracheal intubation associated adverse events and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 135 pediatric subjects (48 pre- and 87 post-intervention) who were transferred to the academic medical center from 9 general emergency departments between May 2014 and August 2019 were included in the analysis. The use of a cuffed endotracheal tube improved, from 44% to 72% (P = .001), whereas there was no significant change in the appropriate endotracheal tube size. Overall, severe tracheal intubation associated adverse events decreased, from 18.8% to 9.2% (P = .03), and post-intubation cardiac arrest events decreased, from 6.3% to 0% (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A simulation-based collaborative intervention program led to improvement in pediatric airway management and subject outcomes in general emergency departments. This model demonstrated the transfer of improvement from a simulated setting to a clinical setting and may be targeted in other clinical settings.

Preparedness for Pediatric Office Emergencies: A Multicenter, Simulation-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric emergencies can occur in pediatric primary care offices. However, few studies have measured emergency preparedness, or the processes of emergency care, provided in the pediatric office setting. In this study, we aimed to measure emergency preparedness and care in a national cohort of pediatric offices. METHODS: This was a multicenter study conducted over 15 months. Emergency preparedness scores were calculated as a percentage adherence to 2 checklists on the basis of the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines (essential equipment and supplies and policies and protocols checklists). To measure the quality of emergency care, we recruited office teams for simulation sessions consisting of 2 patients: a child with respiratory distress and a child with a seizure. An unweighted percentage of adherence to checklists for each case was calculated. RESULTS: Forty-eight teams from 42 offices across 9 states participated. The mean emergency preparedness score was 74.7% (SD: 12.9). The mean essential equipment and supplies subscore was 82.2% (SD: 15.1), and the mean policies and protocols subscore was 57.1% (SD: 25.6). Multivariable analyses revealed that independent practices and smaller total staff size were associated with lower preparedness. The median asthma case performance score was 63.6% (interquartile range: 43.2-81.2), whereas the median seizure case score was 69.2% (interquartile range: 46.2-80.8). Offices that had a standardized process of contacting emergency medical services (EMS) had a higher rate of activating EMS during the simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric office preparedness remains suboptimal in a multicenter cohort, especially in smaller, independent practices. Academic and community partnerships using simulation can help address gaps and implement important processes like contacting EMS.

Using a Semi-Structured Qualitative Interview to Evaluate Pediatric Interns' Use of the Electronic Medical Record in a Simulated Setting.

Introduction Effective use of electronic medical record (EMR) is paramount to delivering safe and effective care. Current EMR education is inadequate, with literature showing frequent deficiencies in skills needed to obtain and interpret data. This study aims to evaluate pediatric interns' perception of EMR inclusion in scenario-based simulation training. Methods A total of 13 pediatric interns participated in an EMR-enhanced, multidisciplinary simulation of a pediatric patient with septic shock during the 2019-2020 academic year. Following the simulation, the interns participated in a semi-structured interview to evaluate the experience of having the EMR incorporated into the simulation and what benefits it offers. Results Of the 13 interns, 12 (92%) felt that incorporating the EMR into the simulation increased the realism of the scenario. All (100%) interns reported that EMR inclusion led to increased learning about the EMR, including gaining or re-learning skills needed to access or interpret electronic clinical data. Participants felt that EMR inclusion in the simulation provided valuable learning opportunities not present in traditional EMR education. Conclusions Integrating the EMR into simulation is viewed positively by pediatric interns, is perceived to improve simulation realism, and helps teach important EMR skills. EMR training would benefit from incorporation into scenario-based simulations.

Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Telesimulation Intervention for Nurses in Community Emergency Departments.

The need for virtual education for nursing staff has dramatically increased because of social distancing measures after the coronavirus disease pandemic. Emergency departments in particular need to educate staff on caring for patients with coronavirus disease while concurrently continuing to ensure education related to core topic areas such as pediatric assessment and stabilization. Unfortunately, many nurse educators are currently unable to provide traditional in-person education and training to their nursing staff. Our inter-professional team aimed to address this through the rapid development and implementation of an emergency nursing telesimulation curriculum. This curriculum focused on the nursing assessment and initial stabilization of a child presenting to the emergency department in status epilepticus. This article describes the rapid development and implementation of a pediatric emergency nursing telesimulation. Our objectives in this article are (1) to describe the rapid creation of this curriculum using Kern's framework, (2) to describe the implementation of a fully online simulation-based pediatric emergency training intervention for nurse learners, and (3) to report learners' satisfaction with and feedback on this intervention.

A Complicated Case of COVID-19 and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome in an Adolescent Male.

Emerging data demonstrate that comorbid conditions and older age are contributing factors to COVID-19 severity in children. Studies involving youth with COVID-19 and diabetes are lacking. We report the case of a critically ill adolescent male with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and COVID-19 who presented with hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS). This case highlights a challenge for clinicians in distinguishing severe complications of COVID-19 from those seen in HHS. Youth with obesity and type 2 diabetes may represent a high-risk group for severe COVID-19 disease, an entity that to date has been well-recognized in adults but remains rare in children and adolescents.

Simulation Training for Community Emergency Preparedness.

Most infants and children who are ill and injured are cared for in community-based settings across the emergency continuum. These settings are often less prepared for pediatric patients than dedicated pediatric settings such as academic medical centers. Disparities in health outcomes exist and are associated with gaps in community emergency preparedness. Simulation is an effective technique to enhance emergency preparedness to ensure the highest quality of care is provided to all pediatric patients. In this article, we summarize the pediatric emergency care provided across the emergency continuum and outline the key features of simulation used to measure and improve pediatric preparedness in community settings. First, we discuss the use of simulation as a training tool and as an investigative methodology to enhance emergency preparedness across the continuum. Next, we present two examples of successful simulation-based programs that have led to improved emergency preparedness. [Pediatr Ann. 2021;50(1):e19-e24.].